Critical discourse analysis of the Decree 170 of differentiated voucher system for special educational needs: The diagnosis as a management tool
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5027/psicoperspectivas-Vol12-Issue2-fulltext-252Keywords:
discourse, diagnosis, subsidy, education, managementAbstract
The Decree 170, a derivation of the demand subsidy model of education or voucher system implemented in Chile under the Pinochet dictatorship, is a formula to subsidize schools administered by privates, and which aims to improve the school integration of Chilean children who have "special needs." To apply for these funds schools need expert diagnosis to corroborate the existence of the problem through diagnostic tools that provide validity, reliability and consistency. This work, using a critical analysis of discourse methodology, seeks to understand the diagnosis not only as an effort to shape, guide and direct the behavior of others. I analyze the use of diagnosis that is part of a biomedical discourse, with all the means of production available for medicine, as a management tool. Diagnosis is a criteria which may be concluded from a positivist and objective discursive order to make "fair" decisions, (objective, reproducible, and supposedly compassionate) in order to rationalize spending on education, without go further in the socio-politics of the integration as a process
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All manuscript will be published under the Creative Commons 4.0 International License.